What the AI does not do
- ×Declare who is right.
- ×Choose the “best” settlement.
- ×Silently reinterpret the evidence rules.
- ×Move a clause to agreed without a valid vote.
Invite-only • evidence-aware • human-decided
Resolve the conflict. Close the deal. Keep the decision human.
The Mediated Table is a private AI-assisted room for people with conflicting interests. The AI helps the process move forward — but it never decides the outcome.
Nothing is agreed until the parties vote, clause by clause, under rules fixed at the start.
✓
Private by designInvite-only rooms for the people who need to be there.
✓
Evidence agreed firstThe parties define what counts as proof before arguing the facts.
✓
No AI rulingNo clause moves to “agreed” because an AI says so.
✓
Auditable outcomeEvidence, positions and votes remain attached to the record.
A different role for AI
Most AI chats collapse the process into an answer.
This one protects the process.
Put opposing interests into one AI conversation and it can start behaving like an arbiter. The Mediated Table separates assistance from authority.
What the AI does
- ✓Check claims against the evidence the parties accepted.
- ✓Flag contradictions with already-agreed clauses.
- ✓Restate positions neutrally and identify the crux.
- ✓Offer option packages that respect everyone’s stated constraints.
How it works
Nine disciplined steps from disagreement to a usable record.
The room makes the rules explicit, keeps claims grounded and preserves decision authority with the parties.
01
Invite-only room
Two or more parties, with a human neutral if they want one.
02
The matter, defined
The convener sets out the conflict or deal and the clauses to settle.
03
Agreed evidence
The parties decide up front what sources count as proof.
04
Labelled claims
Each claim is marked verified, contradicted or not covered, with the relevant passage cited.
05
Incompatibility check
A proposal that conflicts with an agreed clause is flagged before it reaches the room.
06
Restatement, crux, options
Positions are restated neutrally, the crux is named and constraint-respecting options are offered.
07
Hostility nudge
A hostile draft gets a suggested rephrase — never a penalty.
08
Clause-by-clause voting
Only a vote, under rules fixed at the start, moves a clause to agreed.
09
Document of Understanding
A living record of clause status, positions, evidence and votes, ready to sign.
The output
A Document of Understanding — not a black-box answer.
Every clause carries its status, the parties’ positions, the evidence behind relevant claims and the votes that moved it. What is agreed stays distinguishable from what is still open.
Document of Understanding
Live record
Payment schedule
AGREED
Vote recorded
Service-level threshold
EVIDENCE
2 sources cited
Liability cap
OPEN
Crux identified
Transition period
AGREED
Constraint check passed
Where it fits
Built for matters where the process matters as much as the outcome.
The same structure can support negotiated deals, disputes and multi-party alignment where evidence, constraints and explicit consent matter.
🤝
Commercial deals
Work through terms, trade-offs and dependencies without handing decision authority to the system.
⚖️
Dispute resolution
Separate claims from evidence, narrow the crux and keep a transparent record of agreement.
🏢
Workplace matters
Give participants and neutrals a structured room for proposals, constraints and clause-level consent.
🧩
Multi-party alignment
Keep complicated negotiations coherent when several stakeholders have different interests.
Bring the parties to the same table — without giving the table the vote.
Private rooms are invite-only. Use the contact route below to request early access, a pilot or a product conversation.